In short
People who can comfortably afford to retire often do not, and the reason is usually not financial. Work supplies identity, structure and most adult friendships, and leaving it removes all three at once. Couples frequently discover they have been picturing different retirements without ever saying so out loud. These are not financial questions, but they change the financial plan, because someone who retires into an empty calendar often goes back to work or spends very differently from the plan that was built for them.
Picture a common conversation. Someone sits down, we go through the numbers, and the numbers say they could stop working next year. Then they do not stop working. Not because they found a hole in the plan, but because the plan answered a question they were not actually asking.
Our Psychology of Retirement seminar in St. Augustine was about this. The financial part of retiring is the part with a spreadsheet. It is rarely the part people get stuck on.
Work does more than pay you
A job supplies at least four things beyond income. It tells you who you are when a stranger asks what you do. It puts a shape on the week. It provides most of the people you speak to in a day. And it gives you a reason to be somewhere, which matters more than almost anyone predicts.
Retiring removes all four on the same Friday. The money keeps arriving, if the planning was done, but the other four do not replace themselves automatically. People who have thought about this in advance tend to land well. People who have only thought about the money tend to have a difficult six months and then either go back to work or drift.
None of that is a reason to delay retiring. It is a reason to plan for the part of it that has nothing to do with the portfolio.
Retiring from, and retiring to
The most useful question we ask is not how much you want to spend. It is what a good Wednesday looks like.
It sounds soft and it is remarkably revealing. Someone retiring from something can describe the job they are leaving in detail and goes quiet about what follows. Someone retiring to something answers immediately, and usually the answer costs money in ways the plan has not been told about. Travel in the first five years. A boat. Being close enough to grandchildren to be useful rather than visiting. A workshop. Something they have wanted to learn since they were thirty.
Those answers belong in the plan. The first few years of retirement are often the most expensive, not the least, and a plan built on a flat spending line will quietly understate them.
The conversation couples have not had
It happens quietly, and almost never on purpose.
Two people have been married for thirty years, have talked about retirement for a decade, and have never once compared the pictures in their heads. One imagines a smaller place and more travel. The other imagines this house, with the grandchildren in it. One pictures the two of them together every day. The other has been quietly assuming they will keep their own routines.
Neither is wrong. But the two pictures have different costs, and if they are not reconciled before the decision is made, they get reconciled afterward, which is harder. It is worth each of you answering the Wednesday question separately, because the interesting part is the difference in the answers.
The middle option people forget
Retirement is not binary, and treating it as a switch causes a lot of the trouble. Cutting to three days, moving to consulting, taking a lower-pressure role, or stopping in stages over two or three years are all real options, and they solve a surprising number of problems at once. The structure persists. The identity question arrives gradually. The money keeps flowing while savings compound a little longer.
It also interacts with two dates worth knowing about. Social Security is reduced or increased depending on the age you claim, so a partial retirement can be a way of delaying that decision rather than forcing it. And for most people Medicare does not begin before 65, so anyone leaving work earlier has to find health coverage in between, which is often the single largest new cost in an early retirement plan. We wrote about the timing of Medicare enrollment separately, because the deadlines there are unforgiving.
Why a financial advisor is raising any of this
Because it changes our work. A plan built for someone who retires into an empty calendar and a plan built for someone with a full one are different plans, with different spending in the early years, different risk in the portfolio, and different answers on when to claim.
We are not therapists and we will not pretend to be. But we will ask what a good Wednesday looks like before we ask what it costs, and the order matters. If you want to talk it through, whether or not you are close to a decision, we are easy to reach. If you would rather hear how we think about it first, the Psychology of Retirement events exist for exactly that.
This website is for informational purposes only. All information, statements, and opinions contained on this website regarding the securities markets or other financial matters is obtained from sources which we believe to be reliable and accurate. However, we do not warrant or guarantee the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information presented herein. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing in securities involves the risk of loss, including the risk of loss of principal, that clients should be prepared to bear. The information on this website is not intended as personalized investment, tax, or legal advice and we do not provide any tax or legal advice to clients. You should consult with your independent investment, legal and/or tax professionals with respect to your individual financial situation and investment needs before considering any investment or course of investments.
